Shimla, Sept 30,
The Himachal Pradesh government’s recent decision to extend the tenure of senior bureaucrat Ram Subhag Singh for a third term has stirred considerable debate within political and administrative circles. Singh, a former Chief Secretary, had previously faced allegations of irregularities during his tenure as Additional Chief Secretary (ACS) of the Forest Department. Specifically, concerns were raised regarding the construction of the Interpretation Center building in Nagarota Surian, Kangra, with critics accusing him of oversight. Following a complaint made to the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO), Singh was removed from his position on the PMO’s directive, cutting short his tenure as Chief Secretary.
Despite these past controversies, the Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu government has opted to re-employ Singh, a decision that has prompted questions about the criteria being used for such appointments. Many have pointed out that Singh’s tenure has now been extended under multiple administrations, including the former Jai Ram Thakur government, raising speculation about his influence within the state’s bureaucratic machinery.
This decision has also drawn significant attention from Himachal Pradesh’s unemployed youth, who have expressed frustration at the perceived favoritism being shown towards senior officers rather than creating opportunities for new talent. With over 8 lakh unemployed people in the state, the government’s policy of re-employing retired officials has sparked discontent. Protests in Shimla recently called on the government to reconsider its approach, arguing that extending the services of seasoned officers is an injustice to those seeking employment opportunities.
The re-employment of Ram Subhag Singh has also drawn parallels with decisions made at the national level. Critics have pointed to a recent Supreme Court ruling which questioned the central government’s repeated extensions of high-ranking officials, suggesting that such decisions undermine the principle of fair competition and meritocracy. In the context of Himachal Pradesh, similar questions are being asked about whether the state’s bureaucracy lacks sufficiently qualified individuals to take on leadership roles without extending the services of a few favored officers.
Further concerns have been raised by stakeholders within the state’s public sector. The Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board (HPSEB) Employees’ Union has voiced apprehensions regarding the reappointment of Singh, pointing out that his leadership has not always been viewed positively, particularly within industrial sectors. The union has cautioned that continued reliance on a single officer could impact the government’s public perception and possibly hinder its broader administrative goals.
While the government likely views these reappointments as a means of ensuring continuity and leveraging the experience of seasoned officers, there is growing concern that such actions could alienate key segments of the population. Critics argue that the government must balance the need for administrative stability with the need to provide opportunities for emerging talent, particularly in a state grappling with high levels of unemployment.
As the debate unfolds, it remains to be seen how the government will address the growing concerns around this issue. For now, the re-employment of senior bureaucrats remains a topic of intense discussion, with many calling for a more transparent and equitable approach to such appointments.
Empower Independent Journalism – Join Us Today!
Dear Reader,
We’re committed to unbiased, in-depth journalism that uncovers truth and gives voice to the unheard. To sustain our mission, we need your help. Your contribution, no matter the size, fuels our research, reporting, and impact.
Stand with us in preserving independent journalism’s integrity and transparency. Support free press, diverse perspectives, and informed democracy.
Click [here] to join and be part of this vital endeavour.
Thank you for valuing independent journalism.
Warmly,
Vishal Sarin, Editor
