Shimla, May 23
The Himachal Pradesh High Court upheld the conviction of a teacher who was held guilty under juvenile crime by special judge Solan.
The division bench of Justice Vivek Thakur and Justice Rakesh Kainthala has maintained the decision of the Solan Fast Track Court, ignoring the teacher’s appeal.
It is worthwhile to mention that teacher was booked under POCSO act on the complaint of father of a minor pupil belonged to 8th standard of government school in Solan district in 2016.
This teacher was sentenced to ten years of rigorous imprisonment by the lower court in 2020 under various sections of the POCSO Act and the Indian Penal Code.
This teacher had challenged the decision of the lower court in the State High Court that persecution couldn’t recovered any obscene vedio clipping from him as alleged by the victim.
In this case the division bench has made it clear in its decision that the duty of the teacher is to provide safety to the children. He could not take advantage of their helplessness.
Remember, this incident took place in a government school in Solan district and the police had registered a case under sections 354A, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and various sections of the POCSO Act.
At that time, SP Solan Anjum Ara and the then chairperson of the State Women’s Commission, Jainab Chandel also visited the spot and saw the picture drawn in the note book of the student.
Ultimately the police investigated and the trial took place in the fast track court, Solan. On the basis of police investigation and statements of witnesses, the fast track court sentenced this teacher to ten years imprisonment and also imposed a fine.
Arguments were given before the division bench on behalf of the teacher that no obscene videos were found in his mobile. The division bench said that it does not matter. Live viewing could also be done through the internet.
Apart from this, it was also argued that the testimony of class six could be considered correct. Who had said that he had heard from other children of the school that the teacher had done wrong things to the victim girl.
The day this teacher did this, other teachers were not in the school. However, this teacher argued that in the school, children keep playing in the playground during lunch and the staffroom is full of all the teachers.
In such a situation, he could not do such work. But it was proved by the prosicution that there was no other teacher in school on the day of crime.This teacher also argued that the victim’s father, recorded complaint against him out of enimity.
HC said defense couldn’t not present any fact before the bench that why should sentence be suspended when it couldn’t prove the convict innocent.
Empower Independent Journalism – Join Us Today!
Dear Reader,
We’re committed to unbiased, in-depth journalism that uncovers truth and gives voice to the unheard. To sustain our mission, we need your help. Your contribution, no matter the size, fuels our research, reporting, and impact.
Stand with us in preserving independent journalism’s integrity and transparency. Support free press, diverse perspectives, and informed democracy.
Click [here] to join and be part of this vital endeavour.
Thank you for valuing independent journalism.
Warmly,
Vishal Sarin, Editor
