Photo used for indicative purpose only. Source internet
Himachal High Court upholds 6-Year Panchayat Poll ban for False Affidavit, says disclosure Integrity Non-Negotiable
Shimla, Apr 18,
A ruling impacting Panchayati Raj electoral accountability, the Himachal Pradesh High Court has upheld the six-year disqualification of a former Gram Panchayat pradhan for concealing criminal antecedents in his nomination, firmly rejecting the plea that such punishment was “harsh and disproportionate.”
Delivering the judgment, the Division Bench observed that the case was not about the nature of the offence but about the integrity of disclosures made in the electoral process, stating unequivocally that “he has been declared disqualified not for the nature of offence… but… for false declaration made in Nomination Form which must be taken seriously.”
The petitioner, Basant Lal, had challenged the order of the Deputy Commissioner, Mandi, which barred him from contesting Panchayat elections for six years after his election as pradhan was earlier set aside for deliberately concealing the pendency of a criminal case. The court noted that the concealment of such material information strikes at the root of electoral transparency, reinforcing that “the candidate offering himself for public service is expected to act honestly and disclose all particulars carefully with responsibility.”
Rejecting the constitutional challenge to Section 146(2) of the Himachal Pradesh Panchayati Raj Act, the court held that the legislature had consciously prescribed a six-year disqualification to ensure that erring candidates do not re-enter the electoral fray in the immediate next cycle. It reasoned that “any punishment… less than 5 years may render the disqualification… redundant” as Panchayat elections are held every five years, thereby justifying the statutory period.
The bench also relied on observations of the Supreme Court of India, which had earlier declined to interfere with the petitioner’s case and underscored that concealment of pending criminal proceedings in an affidavit is, in itself, a valid ground to annul an election. Quoting the apex court, the High Court noted that the petitioner had “deliberately filed a false affidavit… concealing the factum of pendency of criminal case,” making the annulment legally sustainable.
On the argument that the petitioner had subsequently been acquitted, the court made it clear that subsequent developments do not dilute the seriousness of a false declaration at the time of filing nomination, emphasizing that the electoral process demands full and truthful disclosure at the outset.
In a broader reflection on electoral ethics, the court underscored that “for corrupt practices in the election process, punishment should be harsher,” concluding that the statutory disqualification cannot be termed excessive in light of the objective to preserve the sanctity of grassroots democracy.
Finding no merit in the petition, the High Court dismissed the plea, thereby affirming the six-year ban and reinforcing a strict standard of disclosure for candidates in Panchayati Raj institutions.
About the Author
The HimachalScape Bureau comprises seasoned journalists from Himachal Pradesh with over 25 years of experience in leading media conglomerates such as The Times of India and United News of India. Known for their in-depth regional insights, the team brings credible, research-driven, and balanced reportage on Himachal’s socio-political and developmental landscape.
