Shimla, updated Feb 3,
A decision to withdraw electricity subsidies given to top government officers in Himachal Pradesh has hit a roadblock due to bureaucratic delays. Three months ago, Chief Minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu and the Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited (HPSEBL) decided to stop subsidies for Class A and B gazetted officers, including IAS officers and other high-ranking government officials. However, the process has been stuck, raising concerns about the slow pace of implementation when it comes to cutting benefits for the elite.
In contrast, decisions affecting the common people—such as hikes in fuel, LPG, electricity, water, and transport fares—are implemented swiftly. But when it comes to withdrawing privileges from government officers, delays and red tape seem to take over.
The subsidy removal was planned for February 2025, but HPSEBL is still waiting for the Himachal Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (HPERC) to issue the necessary notification. Without this, the billing system cannot be updated. The subsidies apply to state and central government employees and pensioners in Himachal, including those in boards, corporations, universities, and the military.
This delay is concerning, especially given Himachal Pradesh’s financial crisis. The state is currently burdened with a ₹95,000 crore debt—almost double its budget from two years ago and around 45% of its GDP. Cutting unnecessary subsidies was seen as a step towards better financial management, but the slow progress raises doubts about the government’s ability to enforce tough decisions.
The Chief Minister’s move was widely praised as a fair step, aiming to shift resources from privileged groups to those in need. However, the hesitation in enforcing the decision highlights the challenges of reforming a system that has long favored the elite.
As the file continues to gather dust, citizens are left questioning whether the bureaucracy will ever act on much-needed reforms. The difference in speed between imposing burdens on the public and removing benefits from top officials exposes glaring inequalities in the system.
